Note: This humorously intended sarcastic blog post directly mimics classifications of psychological disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychological Association, but Dogmatic Bayesianism is not in the DSM-5 as an actual psychological disorder - for now.
Dogmatic
Bayesianism Disorder
|
Diagnostic Criteria F61.1 |
|
A. Individuals are convinced that they know what other people want to know. |
|
B. Individuals believe that everyone who is not a Bayesian is wrong. They almost continuously try to
convince others, and there is often a strong feeling others need the be
‘saved’. |
|
C. Strong
tendency to ridicule non-Bayesians, including historical figures. Karl Popper (who opposed
Bayesianism, as it opens the door to dogmatism in science) is an especially common target. |
|
D. A
pervasive obsession with Bayesian statistics, and the use of p-values or hypothesis
testing by others, at the expense of flexibility, openness, and acknowledging that other coherent statistical approaches exist to deal with uncertainty. E. Symptoms
cause clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other
important areas of current functioning. The forceful insertion of Bayesian
statistics into conversations can drive away conversation partners, to the
point where almost all social contact is restricted to other dogmatic
Bayesians. |
|
F. Individuals believe everyone else will become a Bayesian. Older dogmatic Bayesian often
lose bets that everyone will have become a Bayesian by a specific year. If
this bet is lost, they continue to claim everyone will become a Bayesian in
the future and consider this a rationally updated belief. Specify
if: Persistent:
The disorder has been present for more than 12
months. Specify
current severity: Dogmatic Bayesianism Disorder is specified as severe when an academic exhibits all symptoms of the disorder, at which point individuals are classified as having Bayesian Evangelical Syndrome (BES). |
Prevalence
Less than 0.01% of the general population is
affected, but prevalence is estimated to be at 1% to 2% in statistically inclined
academics. Due to diagnostic criterion E prevalence can be up to 80% on certain
internet forums. Men are more frequently affected than women, at a ratio estimated
at 100:1 or greater.
Development and
course
Development of the condition often starts in the
early thirties, but onset can occur at an older age, in which case the
symptoms are often much more severe. There is currently no treatment, and
dogmatic Bayesianism typically increases with age. In rare cases (less than 1%)
spontaneous recovery seems to occur, after which individuals often experience prolonged
feelings of shame and embarrassment.
Risk and Prognostic
Factors
The disorder is more common in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
No comments:
Post a Comment